663 - Azotobacter vinelandii Vanadium Nitrogenase: Formaldehyde Is a Product of Catalyzed HCN Reduction, and Excess Ammonia Arises Directly from Catalyzed Azide Reduction

The V nitrogenase is similar to but distinct from the Mo nitrogenase in various ways. This study tests its activity and patterns with cyanide and azide as substrates; previously this had only been tested with the Mo nitrogenase.

What They Saw
As with the Mo version, cyanide inhibited hydrogen production and the overall electron flux through the V nitrogenase, though less than with the Mo nitrogenase; more cyanide had more effect, up to 75% inhibition of hydrogen and electrons at 50 mM cyanide. Methane formation from cyanide increased at first, and then decreased with more cyanide, while ammonia continued to increase. They didn't measure methylamine in most conditions though, so the electron flux numbers might be off. With low cyanide, there was significant methylamine relative to the methane, about 0.66 to 1, higher than the Mo nitrogenase; this ratio seems to increase to 1:1 as methane decreases.

Interestingly, the enzyme also produces formaldehyde from cyanide. It's not clear whether the Mo version does too and it's too hard to detect, or if it just doesn't. It can be tricky, since other components in the reaction react with it, and cyanide inhibits the Mo enzyme a lot more.

Azide inhibited hydrogen production from the V nitrogenase about 50%. Hydrazine was more of a product from azide than it is for the Mo nitrogenase, relative to dinitrogen and ammonia. Overall activity was less than the Mo version, which is typical, but also because azide seems to reduce the total electron flux in this version. The ammonia seems to come from azide directly, not from the dinitrogen produced, because adding hydrogen gas (which specifically inhibits nitrogen reduction) didn't change the values.

They tried seeing what adding carbon monoxide (CO) might do to affect these reactions. With azide, it rescued hydrogen production, though not the electron flux, and CO didn't entirely prevent some azide reduction. With cyanide, the effects were similar, except the electron flux inhibition was relieved too.

What This Means
It seems that these chemicals have similar effects on the V nitrogenase as they do on the Mo version, but not completely the same. I wonder, though, about the CO assays: CO can be a substrate for the V nitrogenase, reduced mostly to ethylene but also some propylene and methane; how did this affect their assays?

Reference:

Fisher, K., Dilworth, M. J. & Newton, W. E. Azotobacter vinelandii Vanadium Nitrogenase: Formaldehyde Is a Product of Catalyzed HCN Reduction, and Excess Ammonia Arises Directly from Catalyzed Azide Reduction. Biochemistry 45, 4190–4198 (2006).

563 - Construction and Characterization of Hybrid Component 1 from V-Nitrogenase Containing FeMo Cofactor

This study looked at a purified V nitrogenase from Azotobacter vinelandii with the FeMo cofactor instead of FeVco.

What They Saw
They detected only Mo, no V, in the preparation. The activities they saw were pretty weird in some ways: the electron flux going to nitrogen was almost as much as in the Mo nitrogenase (~70%, with the rest going to hydrogen), whereas with the normal FeVco, 50% went to each; in previous studies, V nitrogenase with FeMoco couldn't fix nitrogen at all. On the other hand, with acetylene, almost all electrons went to ethylene in the Mo nitrogenase, whereas only 30-35% did in the V nitrogenase with either cofactor, while 3% went to ethane with FeVco but 10% did with FeMoco, which is consistent with previous studies. So I'm confused.

When they added carbon monoxide, there was inhibition of all nitrogenase versions, as expected.

What This Means
I think something was weird in this study, but I don't know what. It seems very questionable. However, most of the later studies citing this one either accept it without question, or confirm its results, so maybe it's not as questionable as it seems.

Also, it's worth noting that the results only show the electron flux going to each substrate, not the total electron flux, so even if most electrons go to nitrogen in the FeMoco-substituted V nitrogenase, it's still possible that it's fixing a lot less nitrogen overall than either Mo or V versions proper.

Reference:

Moore, V. G., Tittsworth, R. C. & Hales, B. J. Construction and Characterization of Hybrid Component 1 from V-Nitrogenase Containing FeMo Cofactor. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 116, 12101–12102 (1994).

558 - Isolation of a new vanadium-containing nitrogenase from Azotobacter vinelandii

This study is the first to fully purify the vanadium nitrogenase from Azotobacter vinelandii.

What They Saw
They used strain UW (aka CA) and a nifHDK knockout. It didn't seem like they scrubbed the medium for Mo, but they did test the purified product for metals and didn't see a detectable amount of Mo, only V and Fe (in a 1-to-13 ratio), so I guess it's good.

They did acetylene reduction assays on the V and Mo nitrogenases, and found that 90% of the electrons went to acetylene in the former, but only 12% in the latter. It seems like they only measured ethylene production though, so they might've underestimated the total activity by neglecting the ethane produced by the V nitrogenase.

Under argon, the Mo nitrogenase produced 1.6x more hydrogen than the V version. This was the same ratio as that of nitrogen fixed by each version. I'm not sure how much it's possible to compare these enzymes in vitro though. But it seems like the V nitrogenase is better at nitrogen and hydrogen than at acetylene.

As mentioned, ICP emission spectroscopy didn't detect any metals other than V or Fe: no Mo, Cr, Co, Ni, Cu, or W, so that's good.

What This Means
This shows how the Mo and V nitrogenases are similar in some ways and yet different in others. They work in similar ways and are sensitive to similar things, but the products of their reactions and such are different (though possible substrates seem largely the same). By comparing the two, we can learn more about the process of nitrogen fixation in general.

Reference:

Hales, B. J., Case, E. E., Morningstar, J. E., Dzeda, M. F. & Mauterer, L. A. Isolation of a new vanadium-containing nitrogenase from Azotobacter vinelandii. Biochemistry 25, 7251–7255 (1986).

544 - Nitrogenase from vanadium-grown Azotobacter: Isolation, characteristics, and mechanistic implications

It was known that Mo seemed important for nitrogen fixation in Azotobacter vinelandii. This study looked at substituting V for Mo for nitrogen fixation. It wasn't discovered until about a decade later that there were two separate sets of genes for two versions of nitrogenase with different metals, so here they thought it was a substitution of metals in the same protein.

What They Saw
They grew A. vinelandii OP (aka CA) with Mo or V and extracted and purified its nitrogenase. They said it didn't grow without either Mo or V, which seems weird because it should be able to grow with just iron.

The V nitrogenase activity (measured as hydrogen production) was lower than that of the Mo nitrogenase, about 22% of it, though it's hard to compare in vitro assays. It also seemed less stable and more prone to heat inactivation.

They did detect traces of Mo in the V purification, so it's not clear exactly what's happening. There was about 20x more V than Mo. Both purifications could reduce acrylonitrile, propionitrile, and acetonitrile in addition to the more familiar substrates, and hydrogen was produced at the same time. Hydrogen inhibited nitrogen reduction and carbon monoxide inhibited everything except hydrogen production.

In terms of efficiency, they observed that the Mo nitrogenase allocated 70% of its electrons to nitrogen and only 30% to hydrogen (similar to the typical 75%/25% numbers), while electrons in the V nitrogenase only went to nitrogen 25% of the time, which works out to 6 electrons making 2 ammonia, and another 18 making 9 hydrogen. Other substrates gave different numbers, but the V nitrogenase always had higher flux to hydrogen.

It seemed like CO inhibition of the V version was competitive but it wasn't clear that the same was true of the Mo version. And acrylonitrile reduction was different between them: V nitrogenase produced about twice as much propane as opposed to propylene compared to the Mo version.

What This Means
It seems, from the results, pretty likely that they were studying the V nitrogenase (Vnf) in this study, despite slight contamination with Mo. The CO inhibition pattern, and other activity patterns, support this conclusion.

I didn't know that acrylonitrile and such could be substrates for nitrogenase, but perhaps the cyanide residue is reduced to make it a hydrocarbon, either propylene or propane. Not sure this seems more useful than other substrates.

Overall, it's interesting how much this study revealed that wasn't really known until later studies confirmed it.

Reference:

Burns, R. C., Fuchsman, W. H. & Hardy, R. W. F. Nitrogenase from vanadium-grown Azotobacter: Isolation, characteristics, and mechanistic implications. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 42, 353–358 (1971).

542 - Purification and Characterization of the vnf-encoded Apodinitrogenase from Azotobacter vinelandii

This study looks at the vanadium nitrogenase apoprotein and how it works with its own cofactors or those of the other versions.

What They Saw
Azotobacter vinelandii strains possessing or lacking genes for one or more of the nitrogenases were grown and their protein was extracted. They also extracted central cofactors for each type separately.

Without nifB, a strain can't produce any of the cofactors, so it's easier to get apoproteins. They took vanadium aponitrogenase (Vnf version) and activated it with FeVco. Not surprisingly, they only saw activity in strains containing vnf when vanadium was present and Mo or ammonium was not. Extracts of active strains lost activity when treated with heat or exposed to air for 45 minutes, though the holoenzyme seemed more stable to heat.

When they purified the enzyme as much as possible, the delta subunit (vnfG-encoded) seemed only loosely attached to the others, unlike in A. chroococcum where it purifies together with the others; though it's not clear that conditions were the same. It was necessary for active enzyme though, and seems to be involved in inserting the cofactor into the enzyme, but also something else.

They tried replacing FeVco with FeMoco in the V nitrogenase (or vice versa in the Mo version). With the V version and FeVco, carbon monoxide inhibited about 70% of the acetylene reduction activity but no hydrogen production activity. The Mo nitrogenase with FeVco had a fraction of the V version's acetylene activity but no nitrogen fixation; sadly they didn't test hydrogen production.

With the V nitrogenase and FeMoco, it had a bit (1/6th) of the acetylene reduction activity, which seemed insensitive to CO. Ethane production was proportionally higher (1:4 instead of 1:12). Hydrogen production was reduced about 40%. Nitrogen fixation was pretty much abolished.

With the correct cofactors, the V nitrogenase had about 31% the acetylene reduction activity, 34% of the hydrogen production activity, and 22% of the nitrogen fixation activity of the Mo nitrogenase, but it's not clear if these in vitro assays allow for accurate comparisons.

It didn't seem like FeFeco allowed any activity in the V aponitrogenase.

What This Means
It seems like nitrogen fixation requires a very specific environment, and messing with it in various ways (mutations, different cofactors) messes it up while allowing the enzymes to still do less strict activities.

Reference:

Chatterjee, R., Allen, R. M., Ludden, P. W. & Shah, V. K. Purification and Characterization of the vnf-encoded Apodinitrogenase from Azotobacter vinelandii. J. Biol. Chem. 271, 6819–6826 (1996).

541 - Diversity of Nitrogenase Systems in Diazotrophs

This review looks at different kinds of nitrogen-fixing enzymes, real and theoretical. Azotobacter vinelandii itself has three genetically distinct versions, with different central metals in their central cofactors: molybdenum, vanadium, and iron.

The molybdenum version is most common in nature, and used preferentially in organisms that possess it. It has also been studied the most. No known organism possesses either of the other two versions while lacking this one. Protein sequences of this enzyme in different organisms are remarkably similar to each other. It uses 2 ATP to transfer one electron from the dinitrogenase reductase protein to the dinitrogenase complex, and 6 such transfers reduce one dinitrogen to two ammonia (along with 2 electrons going to hydrogen).

The other versions were discovered when Mo or its enzyme were unavailable yet nitrogen fixation continued. They have an extra subunit of unknown function (perhaps cofactor insertion), but otherwise seem pretty similar in structure and function.

Other than those three, Streptomyces thermoautotrophicus has a novel system: it has Mo in the dinitrogenase and the dinitrogenase reductase equivalent is a manganese-superoxide oxidoreductase with no iron or sulfur. It doesn't do acetylene reduction, but far from being oxygen-sensitive, it depends on oxygen for its activity. The overall stoichiometry is similar to the Azotobacter Mo nitrogenase though, including the hydrogen production, but the minimum ATP requirement is only 4, instead of 16.

Then the authors go into some discussion of other nitrogenases, with the same apoenzymes as those in A. vinelandii but with different central cofactors that may or may not be found in nature. For example, a tungsten-iron cofactor, which has been studied before: it doesn't permit nitrogen fixation, but some proton reduction is possible. Then there were chromium- or manganese-iron cofactor proteins: when extracts were treated with o-phenanthroline and purified as apoproteins, activity could be partially restored with solutions including salts of Mn, V, Mo, Cr, or Re. W failed to give this effect, but the others permitted some acetylene and proton reduction activity. I don't have access to the citations for these claims though.

These in vitro proteins, even if they contain weird metals, also seem to contain Mo in equal proportions to the others. A. vinelandii UW3 lacks nif genes required for the primary nitrogenase, but can use alternatives, and some suggest that the V nitrogenase may use Re or Mn or Cr instead; or maybe the Mo nitrogenase proteins are expressed but use these metals. It doesn't seem very clear, but it's interesting.

Reference:

Zhao, Y., Bian, S.-M., Zhou, H.-N. & Huang, J.-F. Diversity of Nitrogenase Systems in Diazotrophs. J Integr Plant Biol 48, 745–755 (2006).

024 - Essential metals for nitrogen fixation in a free-living N2-fixing bacterium: chelation, homeostasis and high use efficiency

The molybdenum (Mo) nitrogenase in Azotobacter is preferred, of course, but molybdenum is not always easy to find, especially in nature. Vanadium and iron are more common and available, so the V and Fe nitrogenases probably see regular use.

What They Wanted to Know

J.P. Bellenger and colleagues had already showed how bacteria capture and take up the metals they need with metallophores and transporters, but they wanted to figure out how much of each metal the organisms actually need.

What They Did

They studied A. vinelandii strain CA as a wild-type, and several mutants with various nitrogenases deleted: CA1.70 only has the Mo nitrogenase, CA11.70 only the V, and RP1.11 only the Fe. They also tested A. chroococcum.

They grew these with all the nutrients they needed except nitrogen and with varied concentrations of Mo, V, or Fe, measuring growth rate (by optical density), metallophore production, nitrogen fixation (by acetylene reduction and ¹⁵N uptake), intracellular metal/phosphorus, short-term metal uptake (with metal heavy/radioactive isotopes), nitrogenase gene expression (by RT-qPCR of nifD and vnfD), and actual nitrogenase protein levels (by Western blot on NifH).

What They Observed

Growth Rates

Not surprisingly, growth rates for each mutant were lower when given sub-optimal amounts of the metals they needed to fix nitrogen (Fe and sometimes Mo or V). But instead of an exponential growth phase in the curve like one expects, they saw initial fast growth, then a second phase of slower growth before stationary phase. Growth rates were also proportional to intracellular metal levels and nitrogen fixation.

For optimal growth, the Mo-only mutant needed 10^-7 to 10^-6 M Mo initially. The same was true of V and Fe. Levels higher than that seemed somewhat toxic, but extra Fe helped reduce that effect.

Growth rates of the V-only mutant maxed about 15% less than Mo-only (0.23 vs. 0.27 h^-1). Fe-only only got up to 0.12.

Metallophores and Metal Uptake

A. vinelandii produces azotochelin and protochelin to bind useful metals and make them easier to obtain. The authors observed that at the highest Mo/V concentration, these metallophores were much more concentrated (possibly to reduce the metal toxicity). These are produced mostly during early exponential phase (which makes sense).

Though actually, measuring V uptake rates with V either free or bound to metallophores, they found that bound V uptake is slower than uptake of free V. This could be intentional (in a non-anthropomorphic sense); that is, differentially regulated. The maximum rate is always found in intermediate concentrations though. Rates for bound V are very slow at high V levels.

It seemed like intracellular levels of each metal didn't have much effect on levels of other metals; they were mainly regulated based on concentrations in the environment. A. vinelandii keeps taking up Mo as long as it is available (A. chroococcum stops at a much lower value though). This matches with other research on A. vinelandii (014).

With V, A. vinelandii levels increase up to a plateau in intermediate concentrations, but at higher concentrations the levels increase beyond the plateau. Similar with Fe, except Fe-only mutants might have a higher plateau than others. Which makes sense.

Metal Levels and Growth/Nitrogen Fixation
In wild-type A. vinelandii, when growing with V and limited amounts of Mo, the cells start by taking up Mo and growing constantly; when outside Mo runs out, they start taking up V. When that is depleted, the growth rate slows down.

Correspondingly, V-nitrogenase gene expression starts up when Mo runs out, though not all Mo-nitrogenase genes necessarily stop expression at that point.

And finally, overall nitrogenase protein levels stay fairly constant until both Mo and V run out, and then they rise a lot.

What This Means

The two phases can be explained this way: after all the necessary metals have been taken up, no more functional nitrogenase can be made, but what's already there can still fix nitrogen, so the cells can still produce biomass but not at maximum capacity. It's like if you have a big factory that can hold 50 assembly lines but you only have enough equipment for 20; you still produce, but not at your maximum.

The rise in nitrogenase levels after Mo and V run out could indicate that the cells produce extra iron-only nitrogenase when necessary because it will take extra to fix as much nitrogen as they were fixing before, since it's less efficient. That's an interesting, clever regulatory effect, though it isn't entirely clear that's what's happening.

At lower metal concentrations, metallophores seem important in part because they allow the cells to capture metals and make them more available, but also because they make metal uptake easier to regulate so they don't become toxic. This isn't as easy at high levels, as shown by lower growth rates.

The molybdenum and vanadium toxicity could be due to inhibition of iron uptake, causing limitation; the observation that more iron helps alleviate toxicity supports this hypothesis. On the other hand, they didn't really see a drop in iron levels in lower-iron conditions.

They saw Mo storage, but strangely not Fe storage, despite A. vinelandii seeming to have iron-storing mechanisms. It could just be the growth conditions (exponential, nitrogen-fixing).

Overall, it's a lot of data about a pretty complex system. I liked this quote from the conclusions:

"Azotobacter vinelandii thus seems to be well adapted for diazotrophic growth in a soil environment where low availability, large spatiotemporal heterogeneity and strong competition may contribute to metal limitation."

Reference:

Bellenger, J.-P., Wichard, T., Xu, Y. & Kraepiel, A. M. L. Essential metals for nitrogen fixation in a free-living N₂-fixing bacterium: chelation, homeostasis and high use efficiency. Environ. Microbiol. 13, 1395–1411 (2011).

185 - Transcriptional Profiling of Nitrogen Fixation in Azotobacter vinelandii

Azotobacter vinelandii is known for its amazing ability to fix nitrogen, converting nitrogen gas into biological forms like protein even in the presence of oxygen. This is apparent even in its name—Azotobacter—which translates approximately to "nitrogen bacteria."

But the nitrogen-fixing process and machinery is pretty complicated and difficult to study in a reductionist fashion. Many components don't work the same outside of the context of the rest of them or outside of the cell itself.

So in this study, scientists (some of whom were involved in sequencing the first A. vinelandii genome) took a broad approach to the subject, by looking at the expression of all the genes in the organism, comparing their expression when the cells were fixing nitrogen compared to when they weren't.

In addition, they examined the expression of genes when the bacteria were grown with or without certain metals needed for the various nitrogenase versions: molybdenum, vanadium, etc. More specifically:

• To study non-nitrogen-fixing cells: they grew cells with ammonium
• Cells using the molybdenum nitrogenase: they grew cells with molybdenum and no ammonium
• Cells using the vanadium nitrogenase: they grew cells with vanadium and no Mo or ammonium
• Cells using the iron-only nitrogenase: they grew cells with iron and no other metals or ammonium

Simple enough.

Then, to measure levels of expression, they extracted RNA from the cells in each condition, converted the RNA sequences to DNA (called cDNA or complementary DNA, converted from RNA messengers), and then these chunks of DNA were sequenced using a high-throughput technology called SOLiD.

SOLiD (or Sequencing by Oligonucleotide Ligation and Detection) is one of the main kinds of next-generation sequencing, alongside Roche's 454 pyrosequencing and Illumina. I had to look it up. Apparently one machine these days can sequence 5 trillion bases per day (for reference, the human genome is about 3.2 billion bases long, so SOLiD could sequence more than 1500 human genomes per day). Of course, this is not cheap: that much sequence data would cost about $500,000.

The way it works is by cutting a piece of DNA into short sequences, binding them to tiny magnetic beads so there's one sequence per bead. Then the beads are mixed into an emulsion of oil so that on average, each bead is encased in a small bit of water in a sea of oil, along with reagents needed for polymerase chain reaction (PCR). This allows the DNA on each bead to be copied many times, all at once yet individually, so that many reactions can be done in the volume of liquid that would normally allow only one. Very cool. This is the same technology used to prepare samples for 454 pyrosequencing.

In pyrosequencing, the sequencing is done with DNA polymerase, which is what is normally used to copy DNA, and each base is added one at a time, so each bead will incorporate only the base that fits with the sequence bound to the bead. When a base is added, a tiny bit of light is given off, which a camera in the machine detects and registers it as the base that was added at that time.
However, SOLiD works a bit differently: instead of DNA polymerase, the enzyme is DNA ligase, which links together two strands of DNA. And instead of single bases, short DNA sequences called probes are added, with the two bases at one end known. When one of these matches the bead's sequence, ligase links it up. The probes are labeled with fluorescent molecules, so the next two bases in a sequence can be determined from the color of the fluorescent probe. Then this is cleaved off and another two bases are added. It's somewhat confusing; this site might help a little.
This system avoids some of the problems that pyrosequencing experiences, such as with accuracy, but has some problems of its own (especially price), so it's useful in some cases and not as much in others.

So what good is sequencing all the cDNA? The number of copies of one cDNA, relative to the copies of others, shows how much the cell is transcribing that gene, which can be an indicator of expression levels (transcribing more may mean that the gene is translated into protein more, so there may be more of that specific protein in the cell). It doesn't always work quite proportionally, since there are mechanisms other than transcription for regulating cellular protein levels, but it can usually provide some interesting data. So they sequenced all the cDNA in the cell and compared the number of copies for each gene to see which ones were present in higher or lower numbers in different growth conditions.

Then after analyzing all this data (a large undertaking in itself) and finding genes that seemed to be expressed at higher or lower levels in the different conditions, the scientists confirmed the most interesting findings using real-time quantitative PCR, which is a more sensitive way of measuring the same information. It works by doing PCR on a gene but adding some kind of fluorescent molecule to detect exactly how much of that sequence is present over time in the PCR. Ideally PCR should double the number of sequences in every round of the reaction, but this doesn't always work exactly, so the most accurate measure is to determine the point at which the fluorescence becomes bright enough that the PCR machine can detect it, and then extrapolate back to figure out how much of the sequence was present at the beginning. It's another way to compare transcription levels.

Ok, finally on to results. The authors found that almost 30% of A. vinelandii's genes were affected when fixing nitrogen compared to when not doing so. Many of these were affected regardless of which nitrogenase the cells were using. Mo nitrogenase growth affected the most genes on its own compared to the other two, but the two alternative nitrogenases (V and Fe) together affected more genes than any nitrogenase on its own. So overall, compared to non-fixing conditions, the using the alternatives affected many more genes than using the Mo version; but compared to each other, using the alternatives didn't change many genes. Apparently using the alternatives involves a large shift in the cell's gene regulation, compared to using the main Mo nitrogenase. I wonder why.

Genes Expressed When Using Mo Nitrogenase
The nif genes that make up the Mo nitrogenase are found in two clusters in the genome, one near the beginning (relative to the origin of replication) and one near the end. Some of these genes form the actual enzyme structure itself, some help to put it together with its metal-containing cofactor and such, and some (especially nifA) regulate the process.

Not surprisingly, the main structural genes increased their expression greatly when the cells switched to nitrogen-fixing mode, between 50 and 150 times higher. The primary dinitrogenase reductase, NifH, increased the most, which fits in with previous observations that a high ratio of this protein to the Mo-containing dinitrogenase allows higher nitrogenase activity.

More surprisingly, other nif genes in the major cluster only increased expression up to about 14 times more. This could be because not much of their proteins is needed, or possibly that they were already expressed at high levels and their regulation is mostly post-transcriptional, so not much change would be visible in transcript levels. In the minor cluster, some genes necessary for making the metal cofactor increased around 20-fold.

Other than these expected increases, lots of other genes changed as well; not surprising, considering that nitrogen fixation is essential for growth in low-nitrogen environments but is also very energy-intensive. The most significant changes were in type IV pilus genes. These pili, little hairlike projections from the cell, are involved in lots of things: motility, sensing the environment, attachment to surfaces, etc. It's not entirely clear what they're doing in this context, but apparently something.

Another important factor for nitrogen fixation is protecting the nitrogenase from oxygen. A. vinelandii seems to do this by consuming a lot of carbon in order to reduce whatever oxygen is present, transforming it to water. Its genome has many electron-transporting proteins such as oxidoreductases and terminal oxidases, some of which did appear to be somewhat upregulated in nitrogen-fixing conditions. This could also be useful for producing more energy to power the nitrogenase. The genes for the uptake hydrogenase, which recovers hydrogen produced by the nitrogenase and regenerates some energy from it, also showed increased expression.

There also seems to be a change in some genes associated with iron and sulfur organization, something else that is important for nitrogenase because it contains multiple atoms of these elements. Also, not very surprisingly, the genes related to molybdenum gathering increased also.

Genes Expressed When Using Alternative Nitrogenases
Obviously, the genes that encode the alternative nitrogenases themselves (vnf genes for the vanadium-containing nitrogenase and anf genes for the iron-only nitrogenase) are going to be upregulated when these are in use. The V (vanadium) nitrogenase is used when molybdenum is not present but vanadium is, and the Fe nitrogenase is used when neither of these metals is available.

But these alternative systems don't have alternative versions of all of the necessary enzymes for fixing nitrogen, only the main ones, so they share some of the proteins that the Mo nitrogenases uses. This is especially true of enzymes involved in assembling the nitrogenases and their cofactors, such as NifUSVMB.

When vanadium was present, vnf genes were upregulated, as I said, but in this case, the vnfH gene encoding the vanadium dinitrogenase reductase wasn't as high relative to the other V nitrogenase components as was the case with the molybdenum nitrogenase. Not sure why. There were some other differences, especially that vnf homologs of nif proteins involved in cofactor synthesis were expressed in different proportions, so the process of V-containing cofactor synthesis might be different somehow.

In the case of the iron-only nitrogenase, the nifH and other components' homologs (anfH, etc.) were upregulated in the same ratio as the nif genes, distinct from the vnf homologs: that is, anfH was expressed much higher than anfDK, around four- to five-fold higher.

Of the genes that don't have anf homologs, some nif genes were upregulated (nifUSVMG again), but in other cases the vnf versions were preferred (vnfENXY). vnfH was also upregulated, even though there is a separate anfH. This is in agreement with other previous studies (003), and may be because vnfH has some kind of role in regulating gene expression.

Genes Related to Electron Transport
All of the nitrogenases require electron transport machinery, since the nitrogenase functions by putting electrons (and protons) onto nitrogen gas (N₂) to make ammonia (NH₃). This takes at least eight electrons for each molecule of nitrogen: six for two molecules of ammonia, and two for one molecule of hydrogen as a byproduct. The alternative nitrogenases produce more molecules of hydrogen, so they need even more.

Some of the genes involved are nifF and vnfF, which encode proteins called flavodoxins that transport electrons. They may not be necessary to fix nitrogen, but presumably they're helpful. When the cells were using the Mo nitrogenase, nifF was upregulated, and both were higher when Mo was absent (though vnfF much more so).

Some other genes that seemed involved included rnf1 genes, whose products are membrane-bound and also help to transport electrons to nitrogenase; they also seem to be important for the iron-sulfur cofactor of dinitrogenase reductase. And fix genes also seem important for electron transport. All of these were expressed more when fixing nitrogen in all conditions, but when Mo was absent, fix genes were much higher than rnf1 genes.

Regulatory Genes
Clearly A. vinelandii's nitrogenase system has a lot of regulation going on, so regulatory genes are important. vnfA and anfA are necessary to use the alternative nitrogenases, as is nifA for the primary nitrogenase, and these regulatory genes increased whenever their respective isozyme was in use, though low levels of them were present constantly. Regulation of these genes is likely to be how the cells turn on and off the alternative nitrogenases.

There are a few other homologs of nifA and vnfA that show similar patterns, but may fine-tune the regulation somehow (how is not yet known).

Other Differences in Global Expression
As mentioned, the transcriptional profile when using the Mo nitrogenase is very different from when using V or Fe nitrogenases, probably because the latter are less efficient. The most apparent difference in this study was in the hutU gene, for urocatanase hydratase, which increased greatly when Mo was absent. This gene is necessary to degrade histidine, one of the 20 common amino acids, which makes sense because cells using a less efficient nitrogen-fixing enzyme might want to get nitrogen from other places too, like breaking down some less essential proteins. Similar results have been seen in other diazotrophs.

Also quite interesting, genes for a putative soluble hydrogenase discovered when the genome was sequenced were upregulated, especially when using the Fe nitrogenase. This may be a backup system for recycling the extra hydrogen molecules that these nitrogenases produce, to recover the valuable energy that would otherwise escape.

Some other genes increased also, but the function of their products is as yet unknown. Might be worth investigating.

Comparing expression when using the V nitrogenase vs. the Fe nitrogenase, there was at least one interesting point: there were a few genes near a vnf operon upregulated during V nitrogenase growth, seemingly related to a transporter system, so they're probably a vanadate transporter.

Evolution of Nitrogenase
There's some debate about which came first in history: the Mo nitrogenase or the alternatives. Since the alternatives are less efficient, it would make some sense if they came first and the Mo nitrogenase just improved on them, especially since Mo and possibly V were probably difficult to find before there was much oxygen in the atmosphere. But no one has discovered a species that has alternative nitrogenases and not the Mo nitrogenase, though there are plenty that have only the latter, and not many that have all three. And this study seems to show that the alternatives evolved from the Mo nitrogenase to allow cells to thrive in environments where Mo is absent, which also makes sense.

So these results are very interesting and potentially useful, and seem to tell us a lot about what's going on inside the cells in different conditions!


Citation: Hamilton, T. L. et al. Transcriptional Profiling of Nitrogen Fixation in Azotobacter vinelandii. J. Bacteriol. 193, 4477–4486 (2011).

034 - NifB and NifEN protein levels are regulated by ClpX2 under nitrogen fixation conditions in Azotobacter vinelandii

Biological nitrogen fixation (turning N₂ gas into usable forms for protein and such) is an energetically expensive process, requiring large amounts of resources the cell could devote to other purposes; however, if that's the only available source of fixed nitrogen, it's worthwhile, because the alternative is paralysis, essentially.

However, being such an expensive process also means that cells will try to regulate its use very tightly, making sure only to use it when it is absolutely necessary. This is different for different organisms; some regulate the same way all the time, some photosynthetic microbes turn everything off or on depending on available light, etc.

Assembly of the nitrogenase enzyme is a very complex process that requires complex regulation as well. This study looks at the regulation of the molybdenum-containing nitrogenase, the primary one, especially the nifB and nifEN genes. NifB is a protein that seems to help synthesize the Mo-containing cofactor essential for the nitrogenase; it also seems to work for the vanadium- and iron-containing cofactors of the alternative versions. The cofactor that NifB makes transfers to the NifEN complex, which adds the Mo for the nitrogenase. This NifB process seems to be a key point for regulating the entire process.

The nitrogenases each have an activator that helps regulate them: nifA, vnfA, and anfA, and these all influence nifB production. But there are probably other genes involved. For example, Azotobacter vinelandii has a gene called clpX2 in between two other nitrogenase-related genes; clpX encodes a common protease that breaks down proteins that are deformed or no longer useful, but clpX2, while seemingly related, is different. It's sometimes found in nif gene clusters in other species, and knocking it out doesn't disrupt nitrogen fixation; rather, it may increase it.

This study looks more specifically at ClpX2's role in regulating nitrogen fixation in A. vinelandii. To do this, they made new strains with modified genes involved in this process:

• UW233: NifB only works when chemical called IPTG is present; can't fix nitrogen otherwise
• UW238: nifB is IPTG-inducible; nifENX is deleted
• UW295: nifB is IPTG-inducible; nifA is deleted
• UW318: clpX2 fused to lacZ; produces more yellow color from ONPG when clpX2 expressed
• UW319: clpX2 fused to lacZ and nifA is deleted
• UW322: lacks clpX2 gene

UW233 allowed them to control when NifB was produced. They found that when cells were growing with ammonium (a source of fixed nitrogen), not fixing nitrogen, they accumulated higher levels of NifB. This is probably because the cells consume NifB when fixing nitrogen; after removing IPTG from the cells' medium, they stopped producing NifB, but those growing in ammonium still had fairly high levels of NifB even after a few hours, while those fixing nitrogen lost most of theirs.

In UW238, NifB accumulates to higher levels regardless of whether or not ammonium is present, so the NifENX proteins seem to be involved in NifB's regulation. In UW295 when nifA is missing and all the major nif genes are silent, NifB disappears more quickly in both conditions; it seems that whatever is degrading NifB isn't activated by NifA.

Using UW318, the authors discovered that clpX2 was expressed more when fixed nitrogen was absent and the cells were fixing nitrogen, so ammonium seems to downregulate it. UW319 revealed that NifA was not necessary for clpX2 expression either; in fact, expression was higher when nifA was deleted. Why is unclear. Semi-quantitative RT-PCR confirmed these results.

So then the question is, how is ClpX2 involved in regulation of NifB and NifEN? So of course they deleted the clpX2 gene to get UW322. The main difference in this strain was that levels of NifB and NifEN were higher than usual, much higher; it seems that ClpX2 plays a big role in their turnover.

However, deletion of clpX2 comes with a price. When fixed nitrogen was present, the cells grew fine, but when fixing nitrogen they slowed down a little, and the initial setting up of nitrogen fixing was slower too.

One interesting specific effect requires a bit of explanation: the Mo nitrogenase has two main components, which are the main part that contains the Mo cofactor and does the actual reaction with nitrogen, called the dinitrogenase; and the dinitrogenase reductase, which kinda recharges the dinitrogenase and prepares it for the next round of reactions. Having these present in different ratios can affect the overall rate of the process.

But what the authors found in UW322, with clpX2 missing, was that there was much more of the Mo-cofactor-containing dinitrogenase than there was normally, while levels of dinitrogenase reductase remained the same. So maybe ClpX2 holds in check the production of dinitrogenase somehow, so the ratios of the two components are optimized.

The authors hypothesized that ClpX2 might provide an advantage when iron is scarce, because the proteins it regulates are both involved in directing a lot of the cell's iron into nitrogenase cofactors, so they tested in low-iron conditions. UW322 seemed to have a slightly greater disadvantage when fixing nitrogen with limited iron than when fixing nitrogen with sufficient iron, but I'm not sure it looks that significant. Could be.

So here's the figure they made to explain their results, showing the regulation pathways:

Figure 10, Martinez-Noël et al. 2011

It doesn't really specify how ClpX2 might repress those proteins (i.e. by their degradation probably); nor is it clear how ClpX2 itself is regulated. But it is interesting.

Citation: Martínez-Noël, G., Curatti, L., Hernandez, J. A. & Rubio, L. M. NifB and NifEN protein levels are regulated by ClpX2 under nitrogen fixation conditions in Azotobacter vinelandii. Molecular Microbiology 79, 1182–1193 (2011).

015 - Characterization of genes involved in molybdenum transport in Azotobacter vinelandii

It is known that molybdenum (Mo) represses A. vinelandii's alternative nitrogenases, at least in the wild-type. What is not exactly known is the mechanism of this repression. Concentrations of Mo as low as 10 μM repress the alternatives, but some strains (such as CA6) produce the alternatives even with high concentrations of Mo. The question is, is this because Mo is not being transported into the cell, or because the protein that represses the alternatives is not functioning properly somehow?

So in the current study, they took a strain of A. vinelandii that can't make the primary nitrogenase but still represses the alternatives when Mo is present, and created mutants using a transposon, Tn5, then grew it on medium with Mo but without nitrogen, so that only those that had a mutation in a relevant gene could grow. And they found two Tn5-induced mutants, and also some that had mutated spontaneously to be able to grow in such conditions.

They named the two transposon mutants FL2 and FL4, focusing on them because the transposon insertion allowed them to locate and study the genes of interest. The mutants could grow pretty much just as fast with Mo present as the parent strain could grow with Mo absent (though these rates were all somewhat slow because they all needed to use the alternative nitrogenases, which are less efficient). Actually FL4 grew a bit faster than the parent.

They isolated and sequenced the section of the genome that the transposons had inserted themselves into, and it turned out that it was the mod operon that I've discussed before (012). FL2 had an insertion in modE, the regulatory gene, and FL4 had an insertion near the end of modB. So it seems like these genes are important for Mo-induced repression of alternative nitrogenases.

Citation: Luque, F., Mitchenall, L. A., Chapman, M., Christine, R. & Pau, R. N. Characterization of genes involved in molybdenum transport in Azotobacter vinelandii. Mol. Microbiol. 7, 447–459 (1993).

012 - Mutational analysis of genes of the mod locus involved in molybdenum transport, homeostasis, and processing in Azotobacter vinelandii

So Azotobacter vinelandii CA6 has impaired molybdenum (Mo) uptake (003). This paper studies the Mo transport system of A. vinelandii, encoded by the mod genes, modEABC. It seems like ModA is a protein that binds Mo outside the cell, ModB brings them inside across the membrane, and ModC powers this process. ModE's role is unknown at this point.

The scientists generated a number of mutant strains of A. vinelandii, knocking out a given gene while also fusing it with lacZ to quantify its expression. They also discovered another mod gene, modG, adjacent to the others but in the opposite strand direction. It looks similar to half of modE, so the protein may have a similar function.

Another enzyme in A. vinelandii that requires Mo is nitrate reductase; the authors measured activity of this enzyme as a proxy for Mo transport activity. The wild-type's activity rises quickly as concentration of Mo in the environment increases, levels off, then rises quickly again at higher concentrations (supporting the idea of two different Mo transport systems). With mutants of modA, modB, and modC, the pattern was always the same: no activity until the concentration reached a certain point (the same point when the wild-type's activity started rising quickly the second time).

Other results were more puzzling: when modE was knocked out in a way that didn't inhibit expression of the other mod genes, it seemed to have good transport activity at lower Mo concentrations but not at higher; and the opposite when its knockout inhibited the other genes.
Strain CA11.6, which genetically combined the lack of Mo nitrogenase in CA11 (002) with the tungsten-tolerant phenotype of CA6 (003), showed good Mo uptake at low concentrations but not at higher. When the modB gene was specifically knocked out of CA11.6, there was hardly any uptake activity at any concentration. Considering my own research, it's difficult to say what is going on genetically in these cases.

When modG was targeted for knockout, it looked pretty much the same as wild-type activity, except when both modG and modE were deleted, in which case it showed activity at much lower concentrations even than wild-type. Explain that, science!

They also directly measured uptake of a radioactive isotope of molybdenum (⁹⁹Mo) in the wild-type and modA or modB mutants. The rate of transport in the wild-type and modB mutant were pretty much constant, though the latter was slower than the former. In the modA mutant though, there was very little transport. They tried adding nonradioactive compounds (Mo, vanadium, sulfate, or tungsten) to compete with transport of radioactive Mo, and found that only Mo and tungsten inhibited radioactive Mo transport by competition. Evidence that the mod genes transport tungsten in addition to Mo.

Lastly, the scientists tested the nitrogen-fixing abilities of mod mutants. With Mo present, nitrogen-fixing growth of modE and G mutants was similar to wild-type. When it was absent, modG knockout grew more slowly and modE more quickly. A double mutant didn't grow hardly at all in either condition, in normal aerobic conditions, but with lower levels of oxygen it grew as well as the wild-type (both very slowly). It could also grow using vanadium (V) and the V-containing alternative nitrogenase.

The conclusions, I suppose, are that modABC are all important for Mo transport, especially at low concentrations. modE's role is not exactly clear, but it may regulate which Mo transporter system is working at a given time (possibly by repressing one and activating the other at low concentrations, and vice versa at high). modG's role is even less clear.

Citation: Mouncey, N. J., Mitchenall, L. A. & Pau, R. N. Mutational analysis of genes of the mod locus involved in molybdenum transport, homeostasis, and processing in Azotobacter vinelandii. J. Bacteriol. 177, 5294–5302 (1995).

003 - Phenotypic characterization of a tungsten-tolerant mutant of Azotobacter vinelandii

One tungsten-tolerant strain from 001 in particular caught the attention of the researchers. Azotobacter vinelandii strain CA6 just happened to mutate spontaneously to be able to fix nitrogen in the presence of tungsten (W).

Later research showed that A. vinelandii possesses three nitrogenase system, actually: the primary, molybdenum-containing one, and two alternatives: one with vanadium instead of molybdenum, and a third with iron. The third is least efficient, but iron is most likely to be available, so it is the most versatile.

But CA6 was still interesting, because somehow it was able to overcome the repressive effect that molybdenum (Mo) and W have on the alternative nitrogenases. So in order to study it, among other things, the scientists made a number of recombinant strains of A. vinelandii, to test the functions of different nitrogenase genes.

They tried growing wild-type strain CA and mutant strain CA6 with different concentrations of W. All tested concentrations of W inhibited CA, and above 1 μM (0.184mg W per liter) all concentrations inhibited it the same amount. With CA6, however, no amount of W seemed to affect its growth. However, when Mo was present (and no W), CA grew about twice as fast as CA6.

To figure out why, they deleted the genes for the alternative nitrogenases to create strain CA6.1.71 (sounds like software versions, heh). Obviously this couldn't fix nitrogen or grow without Mo present for its primary nitrogenase. But when Mo was present, it could grow just as fast as the wild-type, showing that the difference in growth rate is probably because CA6 wastes its energy producing less efficient nitrogenases instead of focusing on the efficient primary one.

They also made some genetic fusions of nitrogenase genes with a gene called lacZ, which codes for an enzyme that breaks the bond between the two sugar molecules of lactose, resulting in one molecule of glucose and one galactose. The purpose of this is that this enzyme also breaks the bond in a molecule called o-nitrophenyl-β-galactoside (ONPG), which releases a molecule of galactose but also o-nitrophenyl, which is a bright yellow color. So when you add ONPG to liquid containing the enzyme, you can tell how much enzyme is present by how yellow the liquid becomes. And by fusing lacZ to other genes, you can get an idea of how much those other genes are expressed in the cell.

So this way, they found that, in the wild-type strain CA, Mo-nitrogenase genes are expressed when Mo or W are present (not surprisingly), and alternative nitrogenase genes are only expressed when Mo or W is absent. In CA6, the iron-nitrogenase is produced with or without Mo or W; only vanadium represses it. And the vanadium nitrogenase in both is expressed only when vanadium is present. They confirmed these results with 2-D gels (described in 001).
(Side note: vnfH, vanadium dinitrogenase reductase, is expressed in CA whenever Mo or W is absent, whether or not V is present; in CA6, it is always expressed regardless of the metals in question.)

One possible reason for the difference between CA and CA6 is the latter's ability to take Mo into its cells; if its uptake of Mo is impaired, that could result in the observed phenotype. So the scientists tested that. They found that, not only was CA6's Mo uptake slower than CA's, but it ceased to take up more above a certain concentration, whereas for CA, the more that was available, the more CA took up. It seemed like there were two separate Mo-uptake systems, one that worked better in low concentrations and one in higher, and CA6 lacked the latter. However, there was still enough Mo present in CA6 that it should have repressed the alternative nitrogenases, so this explanation didn't quite work; there must be something else. These observations just add to the mystery of A. vinelandii CA6.

Citation: Premakumar, R., Jacobitz, S., Ricke, S. C. & Bishop, P. E. Phenotypic characterization of a tungsten-tolerant mutant of Azotobacter vinelandii. J. Bacteriol. 178, 691–696 (1996).