557 - Detection of the in vivo incorporation of a metal cluster into a protein - The FeMo cofactor is inserted into the FeFe protein of the alternative nitrogenase of Rhodobacter capsulatus

This is another study looking at central cofactors from some nitrogenase versions inserted into other apoproteins than usual, but this time in Rhodobacter capsulatus.

What They Saw
They looked at purified enzymes from wild-type R. capsulatus and a nifHDK deletion mutant. The latter should only produce the iron-only nitrogenase, if anything. They had to treat the medium to remove as much Mo as possible so as to be able to control the concentration; this reduced the Mo present from around 1 ppb to less than 0.05 ppb (the detection limit).

They found that adding 10μM Mo to cultures growing with no Mo (and thus producing the Fe nitrogenase) greatly increased the amount of ethane produced from acetylene reduction (up to 40% of the ethylene produced). Without Mo, ethane remained constant at about 2% of ethylene. The amount of ethane increased over 72 hours too, up to 68% of ethylene; however, total activity decreased greatly over that time, down to only about 5% of what it had been before adding Mo. The ethane production rate increased for 24 hours and then decreased more slowly than the ethylene rate. This may be due to repression of the Fe nitrogenase, but the authors claim it is not, because the rate decreases more quickly in late-log cultures with chloramphenicol + Mo than with just chloramphenicol (or neither, which was about the same as with chloramphenicol alone). This shows that no new nitrogenase protein is being made even when chloramphenicol is absent, but adding Mo speeds the loss of it.
They also found that the more Mo they added, the higher the proportion of ethane produced (and also the lower the total acetylene reduction activity).

They tested the sensitivity of the system to oxygen, both with and without Mo: in both cases, more oxygen meant less acetylene reduction, though the system with Mo seemed a bit more sensitive (dropping to almost 0% with 1% oxygen while that without Mo only fell to about 20%), but also they noticed that increased oxygen increased the proportion of ethane produced after Mo was added. So somehow oxygen enhanced the Mo effect.

Rhenium, tungsten, and vanadium did not cause anything similar to the Mo effect. The Mo effect was also absent in mutants unable to produce FeMo cofactor (nifE knockouts), so it seems like the cofactor is part of the system. nifQ knockouts seemed to show the effect only at high concentrations of Mo (0.1-1mM); this gene's product is involved in cofactor synthesis at a different step. Mo uptake wasn't an issue; all strains had the same intracellular concentrations.

Using EPR spectroscopy on purified enzyme, they claim to show that the spectrum for Fe nitrogenase with added Mo is similar to that of the Mo nitrogenase from the wild-type, so it seems like the FeMo cofactor is incorporated into the Fe nitrogenase. I would've liked to see their result for the Fe nitrogenase without added Mo as a control, but I'll have to take their word for it. Though they did do metal analysis that found ratios of Fe to Mo similar to that of the Mo nitrogenase.

The fact that chloramphenicol didn't prevent the Mo effect seemed to show that the proteins required to make FeMoco were present before Mo was added. This was confirmed with lacZ fusions to related genes to observe expression more directly.

What This Means
Is FeMoco actually replacing FeFeco in completed enzymes? Seems more likely that FeMoco is inserting into incomplete apoprotein, but it's hard to distinguish between these possibilities. Considering that the process seems to continue over several days, maybe the FeMoco is actually displacing FeFeco from completed proteins over time. This is supported by the observation of oxygen enhancement of the Mo effect; oxygen seems to make the enzyme more labile.

Reference:

Gollan, U., Schneider, K., Müller, A., Schüddekopf, K. & Klipp, W. Detection of the in vivo incorporation of a metal cluster into a protein - The FeMo cofactor is inserted into the FeFe protein of the alternative nitrogenase of Rhodobacter capsulatus. Eur. J. Biochem. 215, 25–35 (1993).

541 - Diversity of Nitrogenase Systems in Diazotrophs

This review looks at different kinds of nitrogen-fixing enzymes, real and theoretical. Azotobacter vinelandii itself has three genetically distinct versions, with different central metals in their central cofactors: molybdenum, vanadium, and iron.

The molybdenum version is most common in nature, and used preferentially in organisms that possess it. It has also been studied the most. No known organism possesses either of the other two versions while lacking this one. Protein sequences of this enzyme in different organisms are remarkably similar to each other. It uses 2 ATP to transfer one electron from the dinitrogenase reductase protein to the dinitrogenase complex, and 6 such transfers reduce one dinitrogen to two ammonia (along with 2 electrons going to hydrogen).

The other versions were discovered when Mo or its enzyme were unavailable yet nitrogen fixation continued. They have an extra subunit of unknown function (perhaps cofactor insertion), but otherwise seem pretty similar in structure and function.

Other than those three, Streptomyces thermoautotrophicus has a novel system: it has Mo in the dinitrogenase and the dinitrogenase reductase equivalent is a manganese-superoxide oxidoreductase with no iron or sulfur. It doesn't do acetylene reduction, but far from being oxygen-sensitive, it depends on oxygen for its activity. The overall stoichiometry is similar to the Azotobacter Mo nitrogenase though, including the hydrogen production, but the minimum ATP requirement is only 4, instead of 16.

Then the authors go into some discussion of other nitrogenases, with the same apoenzymes as those in A. vinelandii but with different central cofactors that may or may not be found in nature. For example, a tungsten-iron cofactor, which has been studied before: it doesn't permit nitrogen fixation, but some proton reduction is possible. Then there were chromium- or manganese-iron cofactor proteins: when extracts were treated with o-phenanthroline and purified as apoproteins, activity could be partially restored with solutions including salts of Mn, V, Mo, Cr, or Re. W failed to give this effect, but the others permitted some acetylene and proton reduction activity. I don't have access to the citations for these claims though.

These in vitro proteins, even if they contain weird metals, also seem to contain Mo in equal proportions to the others. A. vinelandii UW3 lacks nif genes required for the primary nitrogenase, but can use alternatives, and some suggest that the V nitrogenase may use Re or Mn or Cr instead; or maybe the Mo nitrogenase proteins are expressed but use these metals. It doesn't seem very clear, but it's interesting.

Reference:

Zhao, Y., Bian, S.-M., Zhou, H.-N. & Huang, J.-F. Diversity of Nitrogenase Systems in Diazotrophs. J Integr Plant Biol 48, 745–755 (2006).

024 - Essential metals for nitrogen fixation in a free-living N2-fixing bacterium: chelation, homeostasis and high use efficiency

The molybdenum (Mo) nitrogenase in Azotobacter is preferred, of course, but molybdenum is not always easy to find, especially in nature. Vanadium and iron are more common and available, so the V and Fe nitrogenases probably see regular use.

What They Wanted to Know

J.P. Bellenger and colleagues had already showed how bacteria capture and take up the metals they need with metallophores and transporters, but they wanted to figure out how much of each metal the organisms actually need.

What They Did

They studied A. vinelandii strain CA as a wild-type, and several mutants with various nitrogenases deleted: CA1.70 only has the Mo nitrogenase, CA11.70 only the V, and RP1.11 only the Fe. They also tested A. chroococcum.

They grew these with all the nutrients they needed except nitrogen and with varied concentrations of Mo, V, or Fe, measuring growth rate (by optical density), metallophore production, nitrogen fixation (by acetylene reduction and ¹⁵N uptake), intracellular metal/phosphorus, short-term metal uptake (with metal heavy/radioactive isotopes), nitrogenase gene expression (by RT-qPCR of nifD and vnfD), and actual nitrogenase protein levels (by Western blot on NifH).

What They Observed

Growth Rates

Not surprisingly, growth rates for each mutant were lower when given sub-optimal amounts of the metals they needed to fix nitrogen (Fe and sometimes Mo or V). But instead of an exponential growth phase in the curve like one expects, they saw initial fast growth, then a second phase of slower growth before stationary phase. Growth rates were also proportional to intracellular metal levels and nitrogen fixation.

For optimal growth, the Mo-only mutant needed 10^-7 to 10^-6 M Mo initially. The same was true of V and Fe. Levels higher than that seemed somewhat toxic, but extra Fe helped reduce that effect.

Growth rates of the V-only mutant maxed about 15% less than Mo-only (0.23 vs. 0.27 h^-1). Fe-only only got up to 0.12.

Metallophores and Metal Uptake

A. vinelandii produces azotochelin and protochelin to bind useful metals and make them easier to obtain. The authors observed that at the highest Mo/V concentration, these metallophores were much more concentrated (possibly to reduce the metal toxicity). These are produced mostly during early exponential phase (which makes sense).

Though actually, measuring V uptake rates with V either free or bound to metallophores, they found that bound V uptake is slower than uptake of free V. This could be intentional (in a non-anthropomorphic sense); that is, differentially regulated. The maximum rate is always found in intermediate concentrations though. Rates for bound V are very slow at high V levels.

It seemed like intracellular levels of each metal didn't have much effect on levels of other metals; they were mainly regulated based on concentrations in the environment. A. vinelandii keeps taking up Mo as long as it is available (A. chroococcum stops at a much lower value though). This matches with other research on A. vinelandii (014).

With V, A. vinelandii levels increase up to a plateau in intermediate concentrations, but at higher concentrations the levels increase beyond the plateau. Similar with Fe, except Fe-only mutants might have a higher plateau than others. Which makes sense.

Metal Levels and Growth/Nitrogen Fixation
In wild-type A. vinelandii, when growing with V and limited amounts of Mo, the cells start by taking up Mo and growing constantly; when outside Mo runs out, they start taking up V. When that is depleted, the growth rate slows down.

Correspondingly, V-nitrogenase gene expression starts up when Mo runs out, though not all Mo-nitrogenase genes necessarily stop expression at that point.

And finally, overall nitrogenase protein levels stay fairly constant until both Mo and V run out, and then they rise a lot.

What This Means

The two phases can be explained this way: after all the necessary metals have been taken up, no more functional nitrogenase can be made, but what's already there can still fix nitrogen, so the cells can still produce biomass but not at maximum capacity. It's like if you have a big factory that can hold 50 assembly lines but you only have enough equipment for 20; you still produce, but not at your maximum.

The rise in nitrogenase levels after Mo and V run out could indicate that the cells produce extra iron-only nitrogenase when necessary because it will take extra to fix as much nitrogen as they were fixing before, since it's less efficient. That's an interesting, clever regulatory effect, though it isn't entirely clear that's what's happening.

At lower metal concentrations, metallophores seem important in part because they allow the cells to capture metals and make them more available, but also because they make metal uptake easier to regulate so they don't become toxic. This isn't as easy at high levels, as shown by lower growth rates.

The molybdenum and vanadium toxicity could be due to inhibition of iron uptake, causing limitation; the observation that more iron helps alleviate toxicity supports this hypothesis. On the other hand, they didn't really see a drop in iron levels in lower-iron conditions.

They saw Mo storage, but strangely not Fe storage, despite A. vinelandii seeming to have iron-storing mechanisms. It could just be the growth conditions (exponential, nitrogen-fixing).

Overall, it's a lot of data about a pretty complex system. I liked this quote from the conclusions:

"Azotobacter vinelandii thus seems to be well adapted for diazotrophic growth in a soil environment where low availability, large spatiotemporal heterogeneity and strong competition may contribute to metal limitation."

Reference:

Bellenger, J.-P., Wichard, T., Xu, Y. & Kraepiel, A. M. L. Essential metals for nitrogen fixation in a free-living N₂-fixing bacterium: chelation, homeostasis and high use efficiency. Environ. Microbiol. 13, 1395–1411 (2011).

013 - Molybdenum-independent nitrogenases of Azotobacter vinelandii: a functional species of alternative nitrogenase-3 isolated from a molybdenum-tolerant strain contains an iron-molybdenum cofactor

What They Wanted to Know
Pau et al. knew that Azotobacter vinelandii had three versions of nitrogenase, including one with no heterometal (Mo or V), only iron. All of these had similar requirements for energy and conditions. They're all similar in structure too, except that the alternatives both have an extra subunit.

So Pau and colleagues wanted to purify the iron-only dinitrogenase from A. vinelandii and analyze its structure and such.

What They Did
They used a strain of A. vinelandii with the genes for Mo and V nitrogenases deleted, so the only one it could produce was the iron-only one. Since this strain couldn't fix nitrogen in the presence of Mo (it represses the alternatives), they selected for a mutant that didn't have this limitation: RP306. They grew large amounts of this strain (in a 400-L fermenter) and purified the nitrogenase from it. Then they analyzed the enzymatic activity and chemical structure of protein and metallic cofactor.

What They Saw
The parent of strain RP306 couldn't grow by fixing nitrogen when molybdenum (Mo) was higher than 5nM in the medium, but RP306 actually grew better as Mo increased, up to 20nM.

Since the V nitrogenase has an extra subunit (δ) encoded by the vnfG gene, and the Fe nitrogenase has a homologous gene, anfG, Pau et al. thought that it might encode a δ subunit also. So they analyzed the subunits of the dinitrogenase with SDS-PAGE, and did indeed see a third small subunit as expected, whose amino acid sequence corresponds to the sequence of the anfG gene.

In terms of metal content, the dinitrogenase seemed to have about 24 atoms of iron and 18 of sulfur, which corresponded well to previous work. Not surprisingly, it had negligible V, but surprisingly it had 1 atom of Mo. So they analyzed it with electron paramagnetic resonance or EPR spectroscopy, which gives different curves depending on the chemical composition, and it seemed like the iron-only nitrogenase actually had a Mo-containing cofactor! Though it seemed like only one of the two cofactors in the dinitrogenase contained Mo. They were able to extract this cofactor, observed that it had a Mo-to-Fe ratio of 1:4.3, and could insert into a cofactor-less Mo nitrogenase from Klebsiella pneumoniae and make it active.

This Fe dinitrogenase with a Mo cofactor could reduce acetylene, but only to ethylene, not to ethane like regular V and Fe nitrogenases could produce. This activity, or any other, was only present when the enzyme was paired with the iron-only version of dinitrogenase reductase, not with the other versions.

With other substrates (N₂) or no substrate (just argon), this Fe nitrogenase didn't perform as well as the Mo nitrogenase. With argon, it produced 350 nmol hydrogen per minute per mg of enzyme, compared to 2220 from the Mo version; with nitrogen, it produced about 100 times less ammonia than the Mo version, but twice as much hydrogen as ammonia. This is about 4 times as much as expected from the Mo version, which produces one hydrogen per nitrogen fixed. So about 57% or 4/7ths of its electron flux goes to hydrogen, compared to 25% of the Mo nitrogenase's. They also saw some ethane produced from acetylene somehow, especially when the ratio of dinitrogenase reductase to dinitrogenase was higher; at least half the electron flux went to ethane.

What This Means
Apparently the allegedly iron-only nitrogenase can incorporate Mo-containing cofactor, at least partially, and this affects its activity. I wouldn't expect this to happen much in nature, since in the presence of Mo the Fe nitrogenase wouldn't be produced, so it's not clear what this really means in terms of enzyme activity. It seems important to exclude Mo from the medium when studying the real activity of the Fe nitrogenase though.

From other results, it seems like the cofactors, despite their differences in metal content, can substitute for each other in the holoenzymes, though the resulting activity changes (not surprisingly). The cells rely on regulation of genes that produce the proteins and cofactors to keep things running the way they should be, rather than specificity of cofactor for protein. But it's probably usually not disastrous if there are a few mix-ups. The activity is best with the right match, but it still works somewhat with some mismatches.

Citation: Pau, R. N., Eldridge, M. E., Lowe, D. J., Mitchenall, L. A. & Eady, R. R. Molybdenum-independent nitrogenases of Azotobacter vinelandii: a functional species of alternative nitrogenase-3 isolated from a molybdenum-tolerant strain contains an iron-molybdenum cofactor. Biochem. J. 293, 101–107 (1993).

185 - Transcriptional Profiling of Nitrogen Fixation in Azotobacter vinelandii

Azotobacter vinelandii is known for its amazing ability to fix nitrogen, converting nitrogen gas into biological forms like protein even in the presence of oxygen. This is apparent even in its name—Azotobacter—which translates approximately to "nitrogen bacteria."

But the nitrogen-fixing process and machinery is pretty complicated and difficult to study in a reductionist fashion. Many components don't work the same outside of the context of the rest of them or outside of the cell itself.

So in this study, scientists (some of whom were involved in sequencing the first A. vinelandii genome) took a broad approach to the subject, by looking at the expression of all the genes in the organism, comparing their expression when the cells were fixing nitrogen compared to when they weren't.

In addition, they examined the expression of genes when the bacteria were grown with or without certain metals needed for the various nitrogenase versions: molybdenum, vanadium, etc. More specifically:

• To study non-nitrogen-fixing cells: they grew cells with ammonium
• Cells using the molybdenum nitrogenase: they grew cells with molybdenum and no ammonium
• Cells using the vanadium nitrogenase: they grew cells with vanadium and no Mo or ammonium
• Cells using the iron-only nitrogenase: they grew cells with iron and no other metals or ammonium

Simple enough.

Then, to measure levels of expression, they extracted RNA from the cells in each condition, converted the RNA sequences to DNA (called cDNA or complementary DNA, converted from RNA messengers), and then these chunks of DNA were sequenced using a high-throughput technology called SOLiD.

SOLiD (or Sequencing by Oligonucleotide Ligation and Detection) is one of the main kinds of next-generation sequencing, alongside Roche's 454 pyrosequencing and Illumina. I had to look it up. Apparently one machine these days can sequence 5 trillion bases per day (for reference, the human genome is about 3.2 billion bases long, so SOLiD could sequence more than 1500 human genomes per day). Of course, this is not cheap: that much sequence data would cost about $500,000.

The way it works is by cutting a piece of DNA into short sequences, binding them to tiny magnetic beads so there's one sequence per bead. Then the beads are mixed into an emulsion of oil so that on average, each bead is encased in a small bit of water in a sea of oil, along with reagents needed for polymerase chain reaction (PCR). This allows the DNA on each bead to be copied many times, all at once yet individually, so that many reactions can be done in the volume of liquid that would normally allow only one. Very cool. This is the same technology used to prepare samples for 454 pyrosequencing.

In pyrosequencing, the sequencing is done with DNA polymerase, which is what is normally used to copy DNA, and each base is added one at a time, so each bead will incorporate only the base that fits with the sequence bound to the bead. When a base is added, a tiny bit of light is given off, which a camera in the machine detects and registers it as the base that was added at that time.
However, SOLiD works a bit differently: instead of DNA polymerase, the enzyme is DNA ligase, which links together two strands of DNA. And instead of single bases, short DNA sequences called probes are added, with the two bases at one end known. When one of these matches the bead's sequence, ligase links it up. The probes are labeled with fluorescent molecules, so the next two bases in a sequence can be determined from the color of the fluorescent probe. Then this is cleaved off and another two bases are added. It's somewhat confusing; this site might help a little.
This system avoids some of the problems that pyrosequencing experiences, such as with accuracy, but has some problems of its own (especially price), so it's useful in some cases and not as much in others.

So what good is sequencing all the cDNA? The number of copies of one cDNA, relative to the copies of others, shows how much the cell is transcribing that gene, which can be an indicator of expression levels (transcribing more may mean that the gene is translated into protein more, so there may be more of that specific protein in the cell). It doesn't always work quite proportionally, since there are mechanisms other than transcription for regulating cellular protein levels, but it can usually provide some interesting data. So they sequenced all the cDNA in the cell and compared the number of copies for each gene to see which ones were present in higher or lower numbers in different growth conditions.

Then after analyzing all this data (a large undertaking in itself) and finding genes that seemed to be expressed at higher or lower levels in the different conditions, the scientists confirmed the most interesting findings using real-time quantitative PCR, which is a more sensitive way of measuring the same information. It works by doing PCR on a gene but adding some kind of fluorescent molecule to detect exactly how much of that sequence is present over time in the PCR. Ideally PCR should double the number of sequences in every round of the reaction, but this doesn't always work exactly, so the most accurate measure is to determine the point at which the fluorescence becomes bright enough that the PCR machine can detect it, and then extrapolate back to figure out how much of the sequence was present at the beginning. It's another way to compare transcription levels.

Ok, finally on to results. The authors found that almost 30% of A. vinelandii's genes were affected when fixing nitrogen compared to when not doing so. Many of these were affected regardless of which nitrogenase the cells were using. Mo nitrogenase growth affected the most genes on its own compared to the other two, but the two alternative nitrogenases (V and Fe) together affected more genes than any nitrogenase on its own. So overall, compared to non-fixing conditions, the using the alternatives affected many more genes than using the Mo version; but compared to each other, using the alternatives didn't change many genes. Apparently using the alternatives involves a large shift in the cell's gene regulation, compared to using the main Mo nitrogenase. I wonder why.

Genes Expressed When Using Mo Nitrogenase
The nif genes that make up the Mo nitrogenase are found in two clusters in the genome, one near the beginning (relative to the origin of replication) and one near the end. Some of these genes form the actual enzyme structure itself, some help to put it together with its metal-containing cofactor and such, and some (especially nifA) regulate the process.

Not surprisingly, the main structural genes increased their expression greatly when the cells switched to nitrogen-fixing mode, between 50 and 150 times higher. The primary dinitrogenase reductase, NifH, increased the most, which fits in with previous observations that a high ratio of this protein to the Mo-containing dinitrogenase allows higher nitrogenase activity.

More surprisingly, other nif genes in the major cluster only increased expression up to about 14 times more. This could be because not much of their proteins is needed, or possibly that they were already expressed at high levels and their regulation is mostly post-transcriptional, so not much change would be visible in transcript levels. In the minor cluster, some genes necessary for making the metal cofactor increased around 20-fold.

Other than these expected increases, lots of other genes changed as well; not surprising, considering that nitrogen fixation is essential for growth in low-nitrogen environments but is also very energy-intensive. The most significant changes were in type IV pilus genes. These pili, little hairlike projections from the cell, are involved in lots of things: motility, sensing the environment, attachment to surfaces, etc. It's not entirely clear what they're doing in this context, but apparently something.

Another important factor for nitrogen fixation is protecting the nitrogenase from oxygen. A. vinelandii seems to do this by consuming a lot of carbon in order to reduce whatever oxygen is present, transforming it to water. Its genome has many electron-transporting proteins such as oxidoreductases and terminal oxidases, some of which did appear to be somewhat upregulated in nitrogen-fixing conditions. This could also be useful for producing more energy to power the nitrogenase. The genes for the uptake hydrogenase, which recovers hydrogen produced by the nitrogenase and regenerates some energy from it, also showed increased expression.

There also seems to be a change in some genes associated with iron and sulfur organization, something else that is important for nitrogenase because it contains multiple atoms of these elements. Also, not very surprisingly, the genes related to molybdenum gathering increased also.

Genes Expressed When Using Alternative Nitrogenases
Obviously, the genes that encode the alternative nitrogenases themselves (vnf genes for the vanadium-containing nitrogenase and anf genes for the iron-only nitrogenase) are going to be upregulated when these are in use. The V (vanadium) nitrogenase is used when molybdenum is not present but vanadium is, and the Fe nitrogenase is used when neither of these metals is available.

But these alternative systems don't have alternative versions of all of the necessary enzymes for fixing nitrogen, only the main ones, so they share some of the proteins that the Mo nitrogenases uses. This is especially true of enzymes involved in assembling the nitrogenases and their cofactors, such as NifUSVMB.

When vanadium was present, vnf genes were upregulated, as I said, but in this case, the vnfH gene encoding the vanadium dinitrogenase reductase wasn't as high relative to the other V nitrogenase components as was the case with the molybdenum nitrogenase. Not sure why. There were some other differences, especially that vnf homologs of nif proteins involved in cofactor synthesis were expressed in different proportions, so the process of V-containing cofactor synthesis might be different somehow.

In the case of the iron-only nitrogenase, the nifH and other components' homologs (anfH, etc.) were upregulated in the same ratio as the nif genes, distinct from the vnf homologs: that is, anfH was expressed much higher than anfDK, around four- to five-fold higher.

Of the genes that don't have anf homologs, some nif genes were upregulated (nifUSVMG again), but in other cases the vnf versions were preferred (vnfENXY). vnfH was also upregulated, even though there is a separate anfH. This is in agreement with other previous studies (003), and may be because vnfH has some kind of role in regulating gene expression.

Genes Related to Electron Transport
All of the nitrogenases require electron transport machinery, since the nitrogenase functions by putting electrons (and protons) onto nitrogen gas (N₂) to make ammonia (NH₃). This takes at least eight electrons for each molecule of nitrogen: six for two molecules of ammonia, and two for one molecule of hydrogen as a byproduct. The alternative nitrogenases produce more molecules of hydrogen, so they need even more.

Some of the genes involved are nifF and vnfF, which encode proteins called flavodoxins that transport electrons. They may not be necessary to fix nitrogen, but presumably they're helpful. When the cells were using the Mo nitrogenase, nifF was upregulated, and both were higher when Mo was absent (though vnfF much more so).

Some other genes that seemed involved included rnf1 genes, whose products are membrane-bound and also help to transport electrons to nitrogenase; they also seem to be important for the iron-sulfur cofactor of dinitrogenase reductase. And fix genes also seem important for electron transport. All of these were expressed more when fixing nitrogen in all conditions, but when Mo was absent, fix genes were much higher than rnf1 genes.

Regulatory Genes
Clearly A. vinelandii's nitrogenase system has a lot of regulation going on, so regulatory genes are important. vnfA and anfA are necessary to use the alternative nitrogenases, as is nifA for the primary nitrogenase, and these regulatory genes increased whenever their respective isozyme was in use, though low levels of them were present constantly. Regulation of these genes is likely to be how the cells turn on and off the alternative nitrogenases.

There are a few other homologs of nifA and vnfA that show similar patterns, but may fine-tune the regulation somehow (how is not yet known).

Other Differences in Global Expression
As mentioned, the transcriptional profile when using the Mo nitrogenase is very different from when using V or Fe nitrogenases, probably because the latter are less efficient. The most apparent difference in this study was in the hutU gene, for urocatanase hydratase, which increased greatly when Mo was absent. This gene is necessary to degrade histidine, one of the 20 common amino acids, which makes sense because cells using a less efficient nitrogen-fixing enzyme might want to get nitrogen from other places too, like breaking down some less essential proteins. Similar results have been seen in other diazotrophs.

Also quite interesting, genes for a putative soluble hydrogenase discovered when the genome was sequenced were upregulated, especially when using the Fe nitrogenase. This may be a backup system for recycling the extra hydrogen molecules that these nitrogenases produce, to recover the valuable energy that would otherwise escape.

Some other genes increased also, but the function of their products is as yet unknown. Might be worth investigating.

Comparing expression when using the V nitrogenase vs. the Fe nitrogenase, there was at least one interesting point: there were a few genes near a vnf operon upregulated during V nitrogenase growth, seemingly related to a transporter system, so they're probably a vanadate transporter.

Evolution of Nitrogenase
There's some debate about which came first in history: the Mo nitrogenase or the alternatives. Since the alternatives are less efficient, it would make some sense if they came first and the Mo nitrogenase just improved on them, especially since Mo and possibly V were probably difficult to find before there was much oxygen in the atmosphere. But no one has discovered a species that has alternative nitrogenases and not the Mo nitrogenase, though there are plenty that have only the latter, and not many that have all three. And this study seems to show that the alternatives evolved from the Mo nitrogenase to allow cells to thrive in environments where Mo is absent, which also makes sense.

So these results are very interesting and potentially useful, and seem to tell us a lot about what's going on inside the cells in different conditions!


Citation: Hamilton, T. L. et al. Transcriptional Profiling of Nitrogen Fixation in Azotobacter vinelandii. J. Bacteriol. 193, 4477–4486 (2011).

034 - NifB and NifEN protein levels are regulated by ClpX2 under nitrogen fixation conditions in Azotobacter vinelandii

Biological nitrogen fixation (turning N₂ gas into usable forms for protein and such) is an energetically expensive process, requiring large amounts of resources the cell could devote to other purposes; however, if that's the only available source of fixed nitrogen, it's worthwhile, because the alternative is paralysis, essentially.

However, being such an expensive process also means that cells will try to regulate its use very tightly, making sure only to use it when it is absolutely necessary. This is different for different organisms; some regulate the same way all the time, some photosynthetic microbes turn everything off or on depending on available light, etc.

Assembly of the nitrogenase enzyme is a very complex process that requires complex regulation as well. This study looks at the regulation of the molybdenum-containing nitrogenase, the primary one, especially the nifB and nifEN genes. NifB is a protein that seems to help synthesize the Mo-containing cofactor essential for the nitrogenase; it also seems to work for the vanadium- and iron-containing cofactors of the alternative versions. The cofactor that NifB makes transfers to the NifEN complex, which adds the Mo for the nitrogenase. This NifB process seems to be a key point for regulating the entire process.

The nitrogenases each have an activator that helps regulate them: nifA, vnfA, and anfA, and these all influence nifB production. But there are probably other genes involved. For example, Azotobacter vinelandii has a gene called clpX2 in between two other nitrogenase-related genes; clpX encodes a common protease that breaks down proteins that are deformed or no longer useful, but clpX2, while seemingly related, is different. It's sometimes found in nif gene clusters in other species, and knocking it out doesn't disrupt nitrogen fixation; rather, it may increase it.

This study looks more specifically at ClpX2's role in regulating nitrogen fixation in A. vinelandii. To do this, they made new strains with modified genes involved in this process:

• UW233: NifB only works when chemical called IPTG is present; can't fix nitrogen otherwise
• UW238: nifB is IPTG-inducible; nifENX is deleted
• UW295: nifB is IPTG-inducible; nifA is deleted
• UW318: clpX2 fused to lacZ; produces more yellow color from ONPG when clpX2 expressed
• UW319: clpX2 fused to lacZ and nifA is deleted
• UW322: lacks clpX2 gene

UW233 allowed them to control when NifB was produced. They found that when cells were growing with ammonium (a source of fixed nitrogen), not fixing nitrogen, they accumulated higher levels of NifB. This is probably because the cells consume NifB when fixing nitrogen; after removing IPTG from the cells' medium, they stopped producing NifB, but those growing in ammonium still had fairly high levels of NifB even after a few hours, while those fixing nitrogen lost most of theirs.

In UW238, NifB accumulates to higher levels regardless of whether or not ammonium is present, so the NifENX proteins seem to be involved in NifB's regulation. In UW295 when nifA is missing and all the major nif genes are silent, NifB disappears more quickly in both conditions; it seems that whatever is degrading NifB isn't activated by NifA.

Using UW318, the authors discovered that clpX2 was expressed more when fixed nitrogen was absent and the cells were fixing nitrogen, so ammonium seems to downregulate it. UW319 revealed that NifA was not necessary for clpX2 expression either; in fact, expression was higher when nifA was deleted. Why is unclear. Semi-quantitative RT-PCR confirmed these results.

So then the question is, how is ClpX2 involved in regulation of NifB and NifEN? So of course they deleted the clpX2 gene to get UW322. The main difference in this strain was that levels of NifB and NifEN were higher than usual, much higher; it seems that ClpX2 plays a big role in their turnover.

However, deletion of clpX2 comes with a price. When fixed nitrogen was present, the cells grew fine, but when fixing nitrogen they slowed down a little, and the initial setting up of nitrogen fixing was slower too.

One interesting specific effect requires a bit of explanation: the Mo nitrogenase has two main components, which are the main part that contains the Mo cofactor and does the actual reaction with nitrogen, called the dinitrogenase; and the dinitrogenase reductase, which kinda recharges the dinitrogenase and prepares it for the next round of reactions. Having these present in different ratios can affect the overall rate of the process.

But what the authors found in UW322, with clpX2 missing, was that there was much more of the Mo-cofactor-containing dinitrogenase than there was normally, while levels of dinitrogenase reductase remained the same. So maybe ClpX2 holds in check the production of dinitrogenase somehow, so the ratios of the two components are optimized.

The authors hypothesized that ClpX2 might provide an advantage when iron is scarce, because the proteins it regulates are both involved in directing a lot of the cell's iron into nitrogenase cofactors, so they tested in low-iron conditions. UW322 seemed to have a slightly greater disadvantage when fixing nitrogen with limited iron than when fixing nitrogen with sufficient iron, but I'm not sure it looks that significant. Could be.

So here's the figure they made to explain their results, showing the regulation pathways:

Figure 10, Martinez-Noël et al. 2011

It doesn't really specify how ClpX2 might repress those proteins (i.e. by their degradation probably); nor is it clear how ClpX2 itself is regulated. But it is interesting.

Citation: Martínez-Noël, G., Curatti, L., Hernandez, J. A. & Rubio, L. M. NifB and NifEN protein levels are regulated by ClpX2 under nitrogen fixation conditions in Azotobacter vinelandii. Molecular Microbiology 79, 1182–1193 (2011).

020 - Comparative characterization of H2 production by the conventional Mo nitrogenase and the alternative "iron-only" nitrogenase of Rhodobacter capsulatus hup- mutants

As I've mentioned before, hydrogen gas is a byproduct of nitrogen fixation (which makes sense; nitrogenase adds protons and electrons to N₂ to form NH₃, and in the process some protons and electrons stick to each other, forming H₂. And the different kinds of nitrogenase have different efficiencies—that is, different proportions of protons and electrons that come off as hydrogen instead of actually useful stuff. The molybdenum-containing nitrogenase is most efficient, with one H₂ per N₂ fixed, and the others have higher ratios.

So this study intended to compare different nitrogenases to find out how much hydrogen they produced. It was done with Rhodobacter capsulatus, not Azotobacter, but the enzymes are similar. R. capsulatus is a type of phototrophic bacterium that possesses the primary Mo nitrogenase and also the iron-only alternative, as well as an uptake hydrogenase.

In order to get around the confounding effects of an uptake hydrogenase, which would significantly reduce the amount of measurable hydrogen given off by all nitrogenases, the scientists used a hydrogenase-negative strain they had generated using a transposon (jumping gene). Besides this strain and its parent, they had a strain with the Mo nitrogenase and Mo transport genes deleted (so it could use only the iron nitrogenase), and a hydrogenase-negative mutant of this strain.

The strains were each grown in broth and then exposed to an atmosphere of argon or nitrogen, sometimes mixed with acetylene or oxygen. The purpose of argon is that, when the nitrogenase enzyme lacks any other substrate (nitrogen, acetylene, etc), it will still work but just devote all its protons and electrons to producing hydrogen gas, producing a lot more than in any other condition. Adding acetylene measured the enzyme activity converting acetylene to ethylene (and a little ethane too, in the case of the iron nitrogenase), and adding oxygen measured its effect on the enzymes. Then after some time for the reaction to occur, concentrations of ethylene, ethane, and hydrogen in the headspace were measured.

In an argon atmosphere with nothing else, the hydrogenase-negative Mo nitrogenase strain produced the most hydrogen. In the parent strain that was hydrogenase-positive, the hydrogenase consumed about 1/4 the hydrogen produced. The hydrogenase-negative strain using the iron nitrogenase produced about 1/2 the hydrogen of the top producer, and when present, hydrogenase consumed about 1/2 its hydrogen, resulting in 1/4 the amount of the top producer. So like this:

Under argon:

• nif+ hup-: 100%
• nif+ hup+: 75%
• nif- hup-: 50%
• nif- hup+: 25%

This may seem odd because the iron nitrogenase is supposed to produce more hydrogen (relative to other substrates), but that is not the only difference between the enzymes; the Mo nitrogenase's rate of production (productivity) is also higher, such that it produces more of any product in a given time. Since these reactions were measured after 1 hour, the Mo nitrogenase was able to produce more hydrogen in that time than the alternative, though they might have produced the same amount (or the iron version more) if allowed to consume all their substrate.

The story of hydrogen production is somewhat different in a nitrogen gas atmosphere:

• nif+ hup-: 62%
• nif+ hup+: 5%
• nif- hup-: 100%
• nif- hup+: 3%

Not surprisingly, when nitrogen is present for the enzymes to fix, the alternative nitrogenase produces a lot more hydrogen than the Mo nitrogenase. However, even in the hydrogenase-negative iron nitrogenase strain's case, the hydrogen produced is a bit more than 1/4 of that produced by the top producer under argon. When hydrogenase is present, it is able to consume most of the hydrogen. Similar results are obtained when acetylene is added to an argon atmosphere.

When acetylene was added, the hydrocarbon results were as expected also. Presence or absence of hydrogenase didn't make much difference regarding ethylene and ethane produced. Mo nitrogenase produced much more ethylene than iron nitrogenase, and hardly any ethane; while the iron nitrogenase produced about 17 times more ethane than the Mo nitrogenase, and 11 times less ethylene. Total products for Mo nitrogenase were also about 11 times more than for iron nitrogenase. More efficient, I say.

In terms of protons and electrons, these results suggest that 80% of Mo nitrogenase's electrons go toward nitrogen fixation (that is, 1 hydrogen for every nitrogen fixed, as I said), but only 45% of the alternative's electrons (so, it makes 3-4 hydrogens for each nitrogen).

Oxygen had different effects on the different enzymes also. In the hydrogenase-negative strains, higher levels of oxygen inhibited each, but the alternative nitrogenase's activity dropped to below 40% with very small increases in oxygen levels, whereas the decrease in Mo nitrogenase activity was almost linear with increasing O₂, retaining as much activity as the alternative at more than five times the level of oxygen. So the iron nitrogenase seems to be about 4 times more sensitive to oxygen. Understandably alternative.

So, at least in this species, the iron nitrogenase is 3-4 times less efficient in terms of electrons going to hydrogen, about 11 times slower, and 4 times more sensitive to oxygen than the Mo nitrogenase.

Citation: Krahn, E., Schneider, K. & Müller, A. Comparative characterization of H₂ production by the conventional Mo nitrogenase and the alternative ‘iron-only’ nitrogenase of Rhodobacter capsulatus hup^- mutants. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 46, 285–290 (1996).

017 - Mo-independent nitrogenase 3 is advantageous for diazotrophic growth of Azotobacter vinelandii on solid medium containing molybdenum

Everyone now knows that Azotobacter vinelandii has three nitrogenases, and that the Mo-containing one is the best. The iron-only nitrogenase is the least efficient but requires the fewest different metals (only iron, obviously, compared to iron plus another for the other two). But does A. vinelandii ever encounter situations in nature where it can't find molybdenum? It seems likely.

In this study, the scientists tested the difference in nitrogen fixation between cells growing on agar plates and cells growing in liquid broth. This is important because in liquid, nutrients are constantly being mixed and cells can all experience the same concentration of them, pretty much; whereas on agar, nutrients don't move around much (they're trapped in the gel) so the concentration around the bacteria decreases as cells use them up.

They tried growing two strains, wild-type CA and strain CA70 which lacks the genes for the iron-only nitrogenase, to see if one or the other grew more quickly on each type of medium. It turned out that, with the same total concentration of Mo in each, on agar CA outgrew CA70 more and more over time, while in liquid the numbers of cells of each strain remained about the same. And when they tested the strains on agar with different concentrations of Mo, CA outgrew CA70 more and more the lower the concentration of Mo was.

To confirm this, they used a strain (CA73) that had a fusion between anfH (one of the iron nitrogenase genes) and lacZ (makes an enzyme that can break down a compound into color, used to determine amount of a gene produced). They tested this on agar or in liquid with different concentrations of Mo, and found that expression of anfH was much higher on agar than in liquid for mid-range concentrations of Mo (on the low end, A. vinelandii expressed anfH in both conditions, while on the high end, it didn't need to express anfH in either).

Finally, they used a 2-D gel to confirm the presence of iron nitrogenase subunits.

So it seems that, when A. vinelandii is growing on agar, it can sometimes deplete the Mo present in the agar to the point that it needs to switch over to use the iron nitrogenase. In the soil, where A. vinelandii is found naturally, it is probably a common occurrence to encounter areas of low Mo and have to switch.

Citation: Maynard, R. H., Premakumar, R. & Bishop, P. E. Mo-independent nitrogenase 3 is advantageous for diazotrophic growth of Azotobacter vinelandii on solid medium containing molybdenum. J. Bacteriol. 176, 5583–5586 (1994).

015 - Characterization of genes involved in molybdenum transport in Azotobacter vinelandii

It is known that molybdenum (Mo) represses A. vinelandii's alternative nitrogenases, at least in the wild-type. What is not exactly known is the mechanism of this repression. Concentrations of Mo as low as 10 μM repress the alternatives, but some strains (such as CA6) produce the alternatives even with high concentrations of Mo. The question is, is this because Mo is not being transported into the cell, or because the protein that represses the alternatives is not functioning properly somehow?

So in the current study, they took a strain of A. vinelandii that can't make the primary nitrogenase but still represses the alternatives when Mo is present, and created mutants using a transposon, Tn5, then grew it on medium with Mo but without nitrogen, so that only those that had a mutation in a relevant gene could grow. And they found two Tn5-induced mutants, and also some that had mutated spontaneously to be able to grow in such conditions.

They named the two transposon mutants FL2 and FL4, focusing on them because the transposon insertion allowed them to locate and study the genes of interest. The mutants could grow pretty much just as fast with Mo present as the parent strain could grow with Mo absent (though these rates were all somewhat slow because they all needed to use the alternative nitrogenases, which are less efficient). Actually FL4 grew a bit faster than the parent.

They isolated and sequenced the section of the genome that the transposons had inserted themselves into, and it turned out that it was the mod operon that I've discussed before (012). FL2 had an insertion in modE, the regulatory gene, and FL4 had an insertion near the end of modB. So it seems like these genes are important for Mo-induced repression of alternative nitrogenases.

Citation: Luque, F., Mitchenall, L. A., Chapman, M., Christine, R. & Pau, R. N. Characterization of genes involved in molybdenum transport in Azotobacter vinelandii. Mol. Microbiol. 7, 447–459 (1993).

003 - Phenotypic characterization of a tungsten-tolerant mutant of Azotobacter vinelandii

One tungsten-tolerant strain from 001 in particular caught the attention of the researchers. Azotobacter vinelandii strain CA6 just happened to mutate spontaneously to be able to fix nitrogen in the presence of tungsten (W).

Later research showed that A. vinelandii possesses three nitrogenase system, actually: the primary, molybdenum-containing one, and two alternatives: one with vanadium instead of molybdenum, and a third with iron. The third is least efficient, but iron is most likely to be available, so it is the most versatile.

But CA6 was still interesting, because somehow it was able to overcome the repressive effect that molybdenum (Mo) and W have on the alternative nitrogenases. So in order to study it, among other things, the scientists made a number of recombinant strains of A. vinelandii, to test the functions of different nitrogenase genes.

They tried growing wild-type strain CA and mutant strain CA6 with different concentrations of W. All tested concentrations of W inhibited CA, and above 1 μM (0.184mg W per liter) all concentrations inhibited it the same amount. With CA6, however, no amount of W seemed to affect its growth. However, when Mo was present (and no W), CA grew about twice as fast as CA6.

To figure out why, they deleted the genes for the alternative nitrogenases to create strain CA6.1.71 (sounds like software versions, heh). Obviously this couldn't fix nitrogen or grow without Mo present for its primary nitrogenase. But when Mo was present, it could grow just as fast as the wild-type, showing that the difference in growth rate is probably because CA6 wastes its energy producing less efficient nitrogenases instead of focusing on the efficient primary one.

They also made some genetic fusions of nitrogenase genes with a gene called lacZ, which codes for an enzyme that breaks the bond between the two sugar molecules of lactose, resulting in one molecule of glucose and one galactose. The purpose of this is that this enzyme also breaks the bond in a molecule called o-nitrophenyl-β-galactoside (ONPG), which releases a molecule of galactose but also o-nitrophenyl, which is a bright yellow color. So when you add ONPG to liquid containing the enzyme, you can tell how much enzyme is present by how yellow the liquid becomes. And by fusing lacZ to other genes, you can get an idea of how much those other genes are expressed in the cell.

So this way, they found that, in the wild-type strain CA, Mo-nitrogenase genes are expressed when Mo or W are present (not surprisingly), and alternative nitrogenase genes are only expressed when Mo or W is absent. In CA6, the iron-nitrogenase is produced with or without Mo or W; only vanadium represses it. And the vanadium nitrogenase in both is expressed only when vanadium is present. They confirmed these results with 2-D gels (described in 001).
(Side note: vnfH, vanadium dinitrogenase reductase, is expressed in CA whenever Mo or W is absent, whether or not V is present; in CA6, it is always expressed regardless of the metals in question.)

One possible reason for the difference between CA and CA6 is the latter's ability to take Mo into its cells; if its uptake of Mo is impaired, that could result in the observed phenotype. So the scientists tested that. They found that, not only was CA6's Mo uptake slower than CA's, but it ceased to take up more above a certain concentration, whereas for CA, the more that was available, the more CA took up. It seemed like there were two separate Mo-uptake systems, one that worked better in low concentrations and one in higher, and CA6 lacked the latter. However, there was still enough Mo present in CA6 that it should have repressed the alternative nitrogenases, so this explanation didn't quite work; there must be something else. These observations just add to the mystery of A. vinelandii CA6.

Citation: Premakumar, R., Jacobitz, S., Ricke, S. C. & Bishop, P. E. Phenotypic characterization of a tungsten-tolerant mutant of Azotobacter vinelandii. J. Bacteriol. 178, 691–696 (1996).